PUBLISHED IN FARRAGO

July 7th

Omg hi again!

What's New:

What's In Da Works:

Tangent Philosophical:

I have this theory I was thinking about today. Hear me out on it.

I think people understand eachother as archetypes. What I mean by this is that we don't just meet people and pick up on certain personality traits, we imagine these personality traits to belong to certain characters or narratives they live out, and so these personality traits work together with other traits to form an archetype. Really, an archetype is just a term for a pattern of personality traits, behaviours, memories, etc. Implications:

  1. You make assumptions about other people when you begin to place them in a particular archetype.
  2. While people can push at the edges of the bubble you place them in, they generally do not break the bubble. Their behaviour is contextualised and rationalised into their archetype and they can only mould the archetype very slowly.
  3. When people do pop the bubble, they spawn off a new archetype, defined ub contrast with the old one. Existing assumptions and narratives we have made about them still remain. This is how your worldview expands.
  4. Since archetypes are contextual, when you see people in difference circumstances, different lights, or different framings, you can place them in more than one archetype. This familiarity with the person grows not with how much time you have spent with them, but with how varied the circumstances you have seen them in are.
  5. Whenever you self-reflect, you do this to yourself. You place yourself into archetypes, and it can be a struggle because you are familiar with yourself in many varied circumstances and any one characterisation or narrative will be a simplification.
  6. While you can reflect on the archetypes you view yourself as having, you cannot control the narratives others place upon you. Your system of archetypes is not necessarily the same as theirs (although coming from the same culture, they will have similarites), and so you can't really consciously control how you are perceived, you just have to build yourself by habit into the kind of person who is perceived positively.
  7. Other people always seem more put together, since you see them in fewer circumstances, and without their internal thoughts, that you can fill in the blanks to place them in a limited number of archetypes and narratives.
  8. When we write fictional characters, despite how much depth we give them, they are similarly simplified, into being a specific thing with a specific story, and do not relate the complexities and absurdities of real life---most art is apollonian in this way. Even worse is that as an author, your characters rarely surprise you. Unlike real people, they do not pop their bubble or show themselves in a different light unless you make them.

In Conclusion:

Bye bye guys! Have a lovely July/August I hope the second half of the year is kind to you. Go read a book or something idk. You can reply to this email by the way. I don't think anyone stops you. But don't spam me. Please.

see newsletter archive →